Register
Filtered By Specialty: Service Category: Key Service: Region: Country:

Ratings1-10 of 180 Ratings

Lonza

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 4.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 3.0
  • Confidentiality ---
  • Timeliness 3.0
  • Flexibility 3.0
  • Quality of work 3.5
  • Project contacts and care 3.0
  • Geographic proximity 4.5
  • Culture fit 3.0
  • Environmental sustainability 3.0
  • Financial stability ---
  • Contract / invoice performance 3.0

Excerpt from single Rating

"No constant project contact for us"

Project

Small scale recombinant monoclonal AB

Pro and Contra

  • Phase I/II scale project went very well, not a difficult thing. All services in-house.

  • Company lost some key people during our project and no constant project contact for us.

[Verified Buyer from United States]

CMC Biologics

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 4.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 3.0
  • Confidentiality 5.0
  • Timeliness 4.0
  • Flexibility 3.0
  • Quality of work 3.5
  • Project contacts and care 4.0
  • Geographic proximity 4.0
  • Culture fit ---
  • Environmental sustainability ---
  • Financial stability ---
  • Contract / invoice performance 3.5

Excerpt from single Rating

"Cell line knowledge was very good, clone and process establishement ok."

Project

CHO cell line establishment and early ymanufacture

Pro and Contra

  • We have had other proposals and discussions with other CMOs and decided for CMC Biologics due to the regional closeness. Cell line knowledge was very good, clone and process establishement ok.

  • no comment

[Verified Buyer from USA]

Xendo

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 5.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 5.0
  • Confidentiality 4.0
  • Timeliness 4.0
  • Flexibility 4.0
  • Quality of work 4.0
  • Project contacts and care 5.0
  • Geographic proximity 4.0
  • Culture fit 5.0
  • Environmental sustainability ---
  • Financial stability ---
  • Contract / invoice performance 4.0

Excerpt from single Rating

"Comprehensive expertise."

Project

Life cycle services for product authorized in EU

Pro and Contra

  • This company has profound background based on many projects, team has a good size, knows regulatory requirements very well. Supported us also in interdisciplinary questions.

  • no comment

[Verified Buyer from Germany]

ERA Consulting

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 5.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 5.0
  • Confidentiality 5.0
  • Timeliness 4.0
  • Flexibility 5.0
  • Quality of work 5.0
  • Project contacts and care 4.0
  • Geographic proximity 4.0
  • Culture fit 4.0
  • Environmental sustainability 1.0
  • Financial stability 4.0
  • Contract / invoice performance 4.0

Excerpt from single Rating

Well worth the extra cost for the peace of mind and quality of work.

Project

ERA provided my company with strategic advice and support ahead of an EMA Scientific Advice meeting. The initial Gap Analysis was thorough, and picked up on several issues we had overlooked, whilst the pre- and post-meeting support proved invaluable.

Pro and Contra

  • Quality of work and thoroughness, Good Communication.

  • Not the cheapest consulting group out there, but well worth the extra cost for the peace of mind and quality of work.

Redoxis

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 5.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 4.0
  • Confidentiality 5.0
  • Timeliness 4.0
  • Flexibility 5.0
  • Quality of work 4.0
  • Project contacts and care 5.0
  • Geographic proximity 4.0
  • Culture fit ---
  • Environmental sustainability ---
  • Financial stability ---
  • Contract / invoice performance 4.0

Excerpt from single Rating

"Staff with years of experience!"

Project

Pre-clinical drug validation in experimental MS model

Pro and Contra

  • Staff with years of experience in study design, one contact person for eacht project, very flexible and patiently to our demands and needs. Efficient collaboration to reduce time & costs. The EAE model was well established and run.

  • No comment.

[Verified Buyer from France]

Noble Life Sciences

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 5.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 4.0
  • Confidentiality 5.0
  • Timeliness 5.0
  • Flexibility 5.0
  • Quality of work 5.0
  • Project contacts and care 4.0
  • Geographic proximity 4.0
  • Culture fit 4.0
  • Environmental sustainability 3.0
  • Financial stability 4.0
  • Contract / invoice performance 5.0

Excerpt from single Rating

"Definitely a great CRO for drug development!"

Project

Protein expression development of toxic type followed by invivo model studies. Very nimble and adaptable to working with changes, decisive in forward action. Definitely a great CRO for drug development

Pro and Contra

AbD Serotec

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 5.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 4.0
  • Confidentiality 4.0
  • Timeliness 5.0
  • Flexibility 5.0
  • Quality of work 5.0
  • Project contacts and care 5.0
  • Geographic proximity 4.0
  • Culture fit 4.0
  • Environmental sustainability 4.0
  • Financial stability ---
  • Contract / invoice performance ---

Excerpt from single Rating

"Excellent. All in time, great customer care."

Project

Antibody generation

Pro and Contra

  • Excellent. All in time, great customer care.

  • -

[Verified Buyer from United States]

bioRASI, LLC

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 5.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 5.0
  • Confidentiality 5.0
  • Timeliness 4.0
  • Flexibility 5.0
  • Quality of work 5.0
  • Project contacts and care 5.0
  • Geographic proximity 4.0
  • Culture fit 5.0
  • Environmental sustainability 5.0
  • Financial stability 5.0
  • Contract / invoice performance 5.0

Excerpt from single Rating

"Amazing people!"

Project

Pivotal trial ran in 3 countries over about 20 clinical sites.

Pro and Contra

  • The people are amazing - always willing to do whatever it takes to satisfy their clients... Trial finished under the allotted time period and we were actually UNDER budget... cannot say enough about this.

  • Had to wait a bit for the quote in the front end, but it was well prepared.

NoAb BioDiscoveries

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 5.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 4.0
  • Confidentiality 4.0
  • Timeliness 5.0
  • Flexibility 5.0
  • Quality of work 5.0
  • Project contacts and care 5.0
  • Geographic proximity 4.0
  • Culture fit 4.0
  • Environmental sustainability 4.0
  • Financial stability 4.0
  • Contract / invoice performance 4.0

Excerpt from single Rating

"Experienced team of experts."

Project

In-vivo pharmacokinetics study

Pro and Contra

  • Experienced team of experts. Excellent customercare.

  • no comment

[Verified Buyer from United States]

S.K. International

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 4.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 5.0
  • Confidentiality 5.0
  • Timeliness 4.0
  • Flexibility 5.0
  • Quality of work 4.0
  • Project contacts and care 4.0
  • Geographic proximity 4.0
  • Culture fit 4.0
  • Environmental sustainability 4.0
  • Financial stability 5.0
  • Contract / invoice performance 5.0

Excerpt from single Rating

CRM

Project

CRM

Pro and Contra

  • -

  • -

[Verified Buyer from USA]

10 more

Ratings by service category

Ratings by regionRatings by specialty