Register
Filtered By Specialty: Service Category: Key Service: Region: Country:

Ratings1-10 of 180 Ratings

BioAspect

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 5.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 4.8
  • Confidentiality 5.0
  • Timeliness 4.7
  • Flexibility 5.0
  • Quality of work 5.0
  • Project contacts and care 5.0
  • Geographic proximity 4.7
  • Culture fit 4.8
  • Environmental sustainability 5.0
  • Financial stability 4.8
  • Contract / invoice performance 5.0

Excerpt from single Rating

Great expertise in neurodegeneration!

Project

Drug efficacy testing in rodent models of Alzheimer' s Disease. Behavioral testing memory testing, RAWM, T maze, Barnes, RotaRod tests were performed for the study. In addition, brain dissection, ELISA for amyloid beta, immunostaining for several markers.

Pro and Contra

  • Great expertise in neurodegeneration. Capability to perform in vivo studies, behavioral cognitive testing combined with assessment of biomarkers using Elisa, IHC, real- time PCR.

  • None

Clinnov8

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 1.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 1.0
  • Confidentiality 1.0
  • Timeliness 1.0
  • Flexibility 1.0
  • Quality of work 1.0
  • Project contacts and care 1.0
  • Geographic proximity 1.0
  • Culture fit 1.0
  • Environmental sustainability 1.0
  • Financial stability 1.0
  • Contract / invoice performance 1.0

Excerpt from single Rating

"Worst institute ever!"

Project

Training

Pro and Contra

  • Nothing!

  • clinnov8 is an worst institute,Dr deepthi is an director of this institute.She will promise to provide everything like hands on training on SAS and Internship and she convinces the students very well but she will not implement anything.What ever things mentioned on the prospectus card are fake.This institute is a black listed institute.Dont get betrayed by joining this institute theres nothing in this institute except tables and chairs...Dr deepthi is deceives candidates very well by convincing them politely.She takes money and she tells nothing but sure sure sure sure and only sure.....virtually theres nothing in clinnov8.CLINNOV8 is an worst institute I have ever seen.DONT JOIN THIS INSTITUTE PEOPLE.shape ur career by joining some good reputed institute.

Boehringer Ingelheim

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 4.7
  • Price-Performance Ratio 4.0
  • Confidentiality 5.0
  • Timeliness 4.0
  • Flexibility 4.0
  • Quality of work 5.0
  • Project contacts and care 4.3
  • Geographic proximity 4.0
  • Culture fit 4.0
  • Environmental sustainability ---
  • Financial stability 5.0
  • Contract / invoice performance 4.0

Excerpt from single Rating

"State-of-the-art"

Project

CMO for first-in-man study of mAb

Pro and Contra

  • The process to set up the project required some time due to evaluation done on both sides but the IMPD package was of highest up-to-date quality. Saved time then during CTA process - only a few minor questions from agencies.

  • Cell line not IP-free. Rather for long-term relationship.

[Verified Buyer from Germany]

Pharmya

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 4.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 4.0
  • Confidentiality 4.0
  • Timeliness 4.0
  • Flexibility 5.0
  • Quality of work 5.0
  • Project contacts and care 4.0
  • Geographic proximity 4.0
  • Culture fit 4.0
  • Environmental sustainability ---
  • Financial stability ---
  • Contract / invoice performance ---

Excerpt from single Rating

"Excellent work!"

Project

2 PV SOP writing + 1 PBRER writing+ 1 DSUR writing

Pro and Contra

  • Excellent work. Delivered as per agreed timelines.Their experience in EU and Latin-American regulations was extremely helpful.

RCQ Consulting Inc

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 4.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 4.0
  • Confidentiality 4.0
  • Timeliness 4.0
  • Flexibility 4.0
  • Quality of work 4.0
  • Project contacts and care 4.0
  • Geographic proximity 4.0
  • Culture fit 4.0
  • Environmental sustainability 4.0
  • Financial stability 4.0
  • Contract / invoice performance 4.0

Excerpt from single Rating

IND submissions

Project

Supported us in IND submissions

Pro and Contra

  • -

  • -

[Verified Buyer from Germany]

KeyObs

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 5.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 3.0
  • Confidentiality 4.0
  • Timeliness 4.0
  • Flexibility 3.0
  • Quality of work 4.0
  • Project contacts and care 5.0
  • Geographic proximity 5.0
  • Culture fit 5.0
  • Environmental sustainability ---
  • Financial stability ---
  • Contract / invoice performance 4.0

Excerpt from single Rating

"Extraordinary know how in central nervous system."

Project

Behavioural Phenotyping

Pro and Contra

  • Extraordinary specific know how in central nervous system. Small team who took good care of their clients.

  • nothing

[Verified Buyer from France]

Oviya MedSafe

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 5.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 5.0
  • Confidentiality 5.0
  • Timeliness 5.0
  • Flexibility 4.0
  • Quality of work 5.0
  • Project contacts and care 5.0
  • Geographic proximity 4.0
  • Culture fit 4.0
  • Environmental sustainability 5.0
  • Financial stability 4.0
  • Contract / invoice performance 5.0

Excerpt from single Rating

Cost-effective

Project

Aggregate reporting

Pro and Contra

  • Cost-effective

  • young organization

Dallmann Consultancy

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 4.7
  • Price-Performance Ratio 4.0
  • Confidentiality 5.0
  • Timeliness 4.0
  • Flexibility 4.3
  • Quality of work 4.0
  • Project contacts and care 4.5
  • Geographic proximity 4.0
  • Culture fit 4.0
  • Environmental sustainability ---
  • Financial stability ---
  • Contract / invoice performance 3.5

Excerpt from single Rating

"CMC support for monoclonal antibody"

Project

Review of programme - parameters, assays, spec - to characterise drug substance and final product

Pro and Contra

  • Unique expertise with the background as ex-regulator. Her involvement in many developments helped to set up a valid test programme.

  • NA

[Verified Buyer from Switzerland]

Proteome Factory

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 5.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 4.0
  • Confidentiality 5.0
  • Timeliness 4.0
  • Flexibility 4.0
  • Quality of work 5.0
  • Project contacts and care 4.0
  • Geographic proximity 4.0
  • Culture fit 4.0
  • Environmental sustainability 4.0
  • Financial stability 4.0
  • Contract / invoice performance 4.0

Excerpt from single Rating

mab services

Project

Characterization and quality control of biosimilars (mab) : sequence analysis, ss bridge analysis, glyco-peptide profiling, de novo sequencing of CDR region etc.

Pro and Contra

ICBio Clinical Research

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 1.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 1.0
  • Confidentiality 1.0
  • Timeliness 2.0
  • Flexibility 2.0
  • Quality of work 1.0
  • Project contacts and care 1.0
  • Geographic proximity 2.0
  • Culture fit 2.0
  • Environmental sustainability 1.0
  • Financial stability 1.0
  • Contract / invoice performance 1.0

Excerpt from single Rating

"An absolutely corrupt and untrustworthy organization."

Project

Clinical Research project

Pro and Contra

  • An absolutely corrupt and untrustworthy organization. They made a total hash of our trial.

10 more

Ratings by service category

Ratings by regionRatings by specialty