Register
Filtered By Specialty: Service Category: Key Service: Region: Country:

Ratings1-10 of 180 Ratings

Redoxis

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 5.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 4.0
  • Confidentiality 5.0
  • Timeliness 4.0
  • Flexibility 5.0
  • Quality of work 4.0
  • Project contacts and care 5.0
  • Geographic proximity 4.0
  • Culture fit ---
  • Environmental sustainability ---
  • Financial stability ---
  • Contract / invoice performance 4.0

Excerpt from single Rating

"Staff with years of experience!"

Project

Pre-clinical drug validation in experimental MS model

Pro and Contra

  • Staff with years of experience in study design, one contact person for eacht project, very flexible and patiently to our demands and needs. Efficient collaboration to reduce time & costs. The EAE model was well established and run.

  • No comment.

[Verified Buyer from France]

Biomatik

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 4.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 4.0
  • Confidentiality 4.0
  • Timeliness 4.0
  • Flexibility 4.0
  • Quality of work 4.0
  • Project contacts and care 4.0
  • Geographic proximity 4.0
  • Culture fit 4.0
  • Environmental sustainability 4.0
  • Financial stability 4.0
  • Contract / invoice performance 4.0

Excerpt from single Rating

high quality products

Project

high quality products

Pro and Contra

  • -

  • -

Amplia PharmaTek Inc.

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 5.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 3.0
  • Confidentiality 4.0
  • Timeliness 3.0
  • Flexibility 3.0
  • Quality of work 4.0
  • Project contacts and care 4.0
  • Geographic proximity 4.0
  • Culture fit 4.0
  • Environmental sustainability ---
  • Financial stability ---
  • Contract / invoice performance ---

Excerpt from single Rating

Xenograft model

Project

Xenograft model

Pro and Contra

  • -

  • -

[Verified Buyer from United States]

Dallmann Consultancy

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 4.7
  • Price-Performance Ratio 4.0
  • Confidentiality 5.0
  • Timeliness 4.0
  • Flexibility 4.3
  • Quality of work 4.0
  • Project contacts and care 4.5
  • Geographic proximity 4.0
  • Culture fit 4.0
  • Environmental sustainability ---
  • Financial stability ---
  • Contract / invoice performance 3.5

Excerpt from single Rating

"Pragmatic, flexible"

Project

IMPD for CTA submission to German authority

Pro and Contra

  • She reviewed the IMPD, including pre-clinical investigations and quality parameters for testing and characterisation. Very pragmatic, flexible and fast reactions on ad-hoc questions. Very good knowledge on the matter.

  • na

[Verified Buyer from Germany]

Juno Research, LLC

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 5.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 5.0
  • Confidentiality 5.0
  • Timeliness 5.0
  • Flexibility 5.0
  • Quality of work 5.0
  • Project contacts and care 5.0
  • Geographic proximity 5.0
  • Culture fit 5.0
  • Environmental sustainability 5.0
  • Financial stability 5.0
  • Contract / invoice performance 5.0

Excerpt from single Rating

"Excellent timelines and product."

Project

Financial reconciliation of ongoing research studies

Pro and Contra

  • Excellent timelines and product.

  • no comment

Oviya MedSafe

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 5.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 5.0
  • Confidentiality 5.0
  • Timeliness 5.0
  • Flexibility 4.0
  • Quality of work 5.0
  • Project contacts and care 5.0
  • Geographic proximity 4.0
  • Culture fit 4.0
  • Environmental sustainability 5.0
  • Financial stability 4.0
  • Contract / invoice performance 5.0

Excerpt from single Rating

Cost-effective

Project

Aggregate reporting

Pro and Contra

  • Cost-effective

  • young organization

NoAb BioDiscoveries

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 5.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 4.0
  • Confidentiality 4.0
  • Timeliness 5.0
  • Flexibility 5.0
  • Quality of work 5.0
  • Project contacts and care 5.0
  • Geographic proximity 4.0
  • Culture fit 4.0
  • Environmental sustainability 4.0
  • Financial stability 4.0
  • Contract / invoice performance 4.0

Excerpt from single Rating

"Experienced team of experts."

Project

In-vivo pharmacokinetics study

Pro and Contra

  • Experienced team of experts. Excellent customercare.

  • no comment

[Verified Buyer from United States]

Otava Ltd.

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 5.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 5.0
  • Confidentiality 5.0
  • Timeliness 4.0
  • Flexibility 4.0
  • Quality of work 5.0
  • Project contacts and care 4.0
  • Geographic proximity 4.0
  • Culture fit 4.0
  • Environmental sustainability 5.0
  • Financial stability 5.0
  • Contract / invoice performance 5.0

Excerpt from single Rating

"Reasonable prices, good service"

Project

Ordering of compounds

Pro and Contra

  • Reasonable prices, good service

DSP Clinical Research

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 4.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 3.0
  • Confidentiality 4.0
  • Timeliness 4.0
  • Flexibility 4.0
  • Quality of work 4.0
  • Project contacts and care 4.0
  • Geographic proximity 4.0
  • Culture fit 4.0
  • Environmental sustainability ---
  • Financial stability ---
  • Contract / invoice performance 4.0

Excerpt from single Rating

"All in time and budget."

Project

Phase II study cancer

Pro and Contra

  • Perfect organization of project management, one contact person for entire study, all in time and budget.

  • no comment

[Verified Buyer from France]

HungaroTrial Ltd.

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 5.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 5.0
  • Confidentiality 5.0
  • Timeliness 5.0
  • Flexibility 5.0
  • Quality of work 5.0
  • Project contacts and care 5.0
  • Geographic proximity 5.0
  • Culture fit 5.0
  • Environmental sustainability 5.0
  • Financial stability 5.0
  • Contract / invoice performance 5.0

Excerpt from single Rating

"Excellent partner for phase 3 study."

Project

Phase 3 study

Pro and Contra

  • Central location in East-EU, quick feasibilities, quick RA approval, high patient enrollment.

  • none

10 more

Ratings by service category

Ratings by regionRatings by specialty