Register
Filtered By Specialty: Service Category: Key Service: Region: Country:

Ratings1-10 of 180 Ratings

epista IT ApS

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 5.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 5.0
  • Confidentiality 5.0
  • Timeliness 4.0
  • Flexibility 4.0
  • Quality of work 5.0
  • Project contacts and care 5.0
  • Geographic proximity 4.0
  • Culture fit 4.0
  • Environmental sustainability 3.0
  • Financial stability 4.0
  • Contract / invoice performance 4.0

Excerpt from single Rating

"I would recommend this service to any FDA regulated organization."

Project

epista IT assisted my corporation in QMS selection and implementation. I would recommend this service to any FDA regulated organization, searching for SharePoint based EDMS or QMS as they are trustworthy and independent of the software vendor.

Pro and Contra

  • I would recommend this service to any FDA regulated organization.

  • -

Abnova Corporation

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 3.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 3.0
  • Confidentiality 4.0
  • Timeliness 4.0
  • Flexibility 4.0
  • Quality of work 4.0
  • Project contacts and care ---
  • Geographic proximity 3.0
  • Culture fit 4.0
  • Environmental sustainability 4.0
  • Financial stability 4.0
  • Contract / invoice performance 4.0

Excerpt from single Rating

Protein expression

Project

protein expression

Pro and Contra

  • no comment

  • no comment

ICBio Clinical Research

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 1.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 1.0
  • Confidentiality 1.0
  • Timeliness 2.0
  • Flexibility 2.0
  • Quality of work 1.0
  • Project contacts and care 1.0
  • Geographic proximity 2.0
  • Culture fit 2.0
  • Environmental sustainability 1.0
  • Financial stability 1.0
  • Contract / invoice performance 1.0

Excerpt from single Rating

"An absolutely corrupt and untrustworthy organization."

Project

Clinical Research project

Pro and Contra

  • An absolutely corrupt and untrustworthy organization. They made a total hash of our trial.

Gag Pharmaceuticals

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 4.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 4.0
  • Confidentiality 4.0
  • Timeliness 4.0
  • Flexibility 3.0
  • Quality of work 4.0
  • Project contacts and care 3.0
  • Geographic proximity 3.0
  • Culture fit 3.0
  • Environmental sustainability 3.0
  • Financial stability ---
  • Contract / invoice performance 4.0

Excerpt from single Rating

"Good service for fair price."

Project

Third party manufacturing Ibuprofen.

Pro and Contra

  • Good service for fair price.

  • Some improvements in project management are recommended.

[Verified Buyer from France]

Redoxis

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 5.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 4.0
  • Confidentiality 5.0
  • Timeliness 4.0
  • Flexibility 5.0
  • Quality of work 4.0
  • Project contacts and care 5.0
  • Geographic proximity 4.0
  • Culture fit ---
  • Environmental sustainability ---
  • Financial stability ---
  • Contract / invoice performance 4.0

Excerpt from single Rating

"Staff with years of experience!"

Project

Pre-clinical drug validation in experimental MS model

Pro and Contra

  • Staff with years of experience in study design, one contact person for eacht project, very flexible and patiently to our demands and needs. Efficient collaboration to reduce time & costs. The EAE model was well established and run.

  • No comment.

[Verified Buyer from France]

Pharm-Olam International

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 4.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 3.0
  • Confidentiality 5.0
  • Timeliness 5.0
  • Flexibility 5.0
  • Quality of work 4.0
  • Project contacts and care 4.0
  • Geographic proximity 4.0
  • Culture fit 4.0
  • Environmental sustainability 4.0
  • Financial stability 5.0
  • Contract / invoice performance 4.0

Excerpt from single Rating

Oncology

Project

Oncology

Pro and Contra

BioProcess Technology Consultants (BPTC)

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 5.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 5.0
  • Confidentiality 5.0
  • Timeliness 5.0
  • Flexibility 5.0
  • Quality of work 5.0
  • Project contacts and care 5.0
  • Geographic proximity 4.5
  • Culture fit 5.0
  • Environmental sustainability 5.0
  • Financial stability 5.0
  • Contract / invoice performance 5.0

Excerpt from single Rating

"They really understood our needs."

Project

Assistance with identification of a suitable manufacturing option for my early stage antibody products.

Pro and Contra

  • Worked with our team to really understand our needs and assisted us in developing a cost-effective development strategy that met our goals.

  • Nothing negative.

Richter Helm BioTec

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 4.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 3.0
  • Confidentiality ---
  • Timeliness 4.0
  • Flexibility 3.0
  • Quality of work 4.0
  • Project contacts and care 4.0
  • Geographic proximity 3.0
  • Culture fit 4.0
  • Environmental sustainability 4.0
  • Financial stability ---
  • Contract / invoice performance ---

Excerpt from single Rating

"Profound experience in strain generation and process development for E.coli"

Project

Protein in E.coli for tox

Pro and Contra

  • Profound experience in strain generation and process development for E.coli. Good analytical capabilities, also for bioassays, HCP and immunogenicity testing

  • Could not continue as we wished

[Verified Buyer from United States]

MyBioSource

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 1.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 5.0
  • Confidentiality ---
  • Timeliness 3.0
  • Flexibility 3.0
  • Quality of work 1.0
  • Project contacts and care 2.0
  • Geographic proximity 4.0
  • Culture fit 4.0
  • Environmental sustainability 3.0
  • Financial stability 3.0
  • Contract / invoice performance 3.0

Excerpt from single Rating

Quality of products is very poor/cheap.

Project

Quality of products is very poor/cheap. Someone in middle school could write better operation instructions than what is provided.

Pro and Contra

  • -

  • -

HungaroTrial Ltd.

Criteria

  • Expertise / Capability 5.0
  • Price-Performance Ratio 5.0
  • Confidentiality 5.0
  • Timeliness 5.0
  • Flexibility 5.0
  • Quality of work 5.0
  • Project contacts and care 5.0
  • Geographic proximity 5.0
  • Culture fit 5.0
  • Environmental sustainability 5.0
  • Financial stability 5.0
  • Contract / invoice performance 5.0

Excerpt from single Rating

"Excellent partner for phase 3 study."

Project

Phase 3 study

Pro and Contra

  • Central location in East-EU, quick feasibilities, quick RA approval, high patient enrollment.

  • none

10 more

Ratings by service category

Ratings by regionRatings by specialty